On Friday 1 Mar 02, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) writes: > Perhaps. It's an esoteric one. The original poster of this question wanted > to know if Cygwin 1.3.2 would work with Win2000. I replied with the FAQ > entry that says Cygwin works with 9x/Me/NT/W2K/XP. The reply I got back > from the poster then was that he had seen this entry but thought it > referenced only the current Cygwin DLL (1.3.9 at that point). So the only > question I was raising was whether you think it would be more or less > confusing to people to add some wording to the FAQ entry that specifies > that any recent Cygwin DLL works with Windows, not just the latest. > It's not clear to me that this additional wording wouldn't raise more > questions than it answers. Judging by your response, I think leaving things > as is may be the best option. What do you think?
I think it's best to leave this entry as it is. Thanks, David -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
