I posted an apparent bug report about gcc/Cygwin 1.3.9 aborting on function prototypes that worked flawlessly under gcc/RH. I tried to write a descriptive statement and included cygcheck output. It was posted about a week ago, and I haven't seen a reply yet. Is there further information I can post that will be useful in replying?
TIA, -- Jonathan Hayward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://JonathansCorner.com (A four dimensional maze, stories, essays, artwork, and other things...) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
