> The Windows term for these things is 'shortcut'. > Perhaps you want to call your tool mkshortcut? > Yeah, it's longer, but it's less ambiguous than > mklink. There's already enough confusion between > linking executables from object modules and hard and
> symbolic links in the file system. Also, since the > files created are .lnk files, mklink doesn't > immediately make one see the connection. Perhaps > mklnk would be more accurate. > > (And I haven't even had a chance to _look_ at the > tool itself. Well, they're called shortcuts...or (in the MS documentation I read) "OLE Links". Oops. "mkshortcut" is a good idea, though, much more to the point of the app. The name came from a function call and .c file in cygwin's setup.exe source. In the archive the executable is actually prog.exe--easier to TAB-complete--because I wasn't sure of the name myself. I guess you noticed it was version 0.1 anyway... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/