=== ----- Original Message ----- From: "egor duda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 3:18 AM Subject: Re: Descriptor passing between process
> Hi! > > Thursday, 24 January, 2002 Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > CV> It *could* be implemented. > > CV> First we would have to implement the control message passing at all and > CV> when it's available we could perhaps even implement descriptor passing > CV> using the DuplicateHandle() function. > > To call DuplicateHandle() you must have a process handle of the peer. > i don't know how can we do it properly without cygwin daemon. Egor, we can have the daemon when someone submits a critical review of the implementation, with a summary of "Completely broken" "Good, but X should be done before merging to HEAD" "Looks good, work in progress as everything is, but I'd be happy with it in HEAD". AFAICT Chris is looking for someone to actually read the code and say what they think. If it's bad it tells me what to fix, if it's good, then we get the daemon. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
