On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 02:12:43AM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote: >Chris, >I know you don't like private mail.
No, I don't. I am redirecting this to the project mailing list. >But, could this statement from Glenn tame you a bit... If anyone looked at sources which have any restrictive license then they are tainted. I know this sounds ridiculous, and I don't like, it but it is really not something I want to experiment with -- especially when both companies presumably have lawyers on staff who are interested in things like this. Why don't you post the licensing of the source code that you inspected? cgf >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Glenn Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:20 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: ast on Cygwin >> >> >> >> > > I've finally contacted the Cygwin folks... >> >> you looked at the ast sources, not uwin >> and you only looked at the cygwin workaround part of ast >> if that is a hangup point then maybe something can be done for that part >> >> uwin source has not been released, so you are not uwin tainted -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
