On 22 Dec 2001 10:15:51 +0100 Andrew Markebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which cvs do you use (cygwin?) and how do you connect to the repository? cvs --version: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11 (Client/Server) uname -a: CYGWIN_98-4.10 PRO2 1.3.5(0.47/3/2) 2001-11-13 23:16 i686 unknown Environment CVS_RSH=ssh first. Then cvs commands are executed either from the DOS prompt or from bash. The results are the same. > Doesn't the windows/dos cvs'es convert CRLF's to LF (or what it is ;-) > When we use wincvs around here, talking to a repository-server on > unix, I think it is taken care of automagically. I suspect the CR is filtered out somewhere. They are definately in the repository. The files were created on a Samba share using the Borland IDE which produces CRLF's, before importing and commiting with a Linux client to a Linux server. Linux's CVS works perfectly and has no problem with the CR's. It is only Cygwin that has the problem with the existing repository. > Hmm could it be the mounts of the filesystems you edit the files on? > If you mount it as textmode, cygwin cvs might just see the LF's.. I will have to look into mounts. It is a default install but setting CYGWIN=binmode doesn't help. > /Andy > > / David Koski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Hello, > | > | I have been using CVS successfully to maintain source code on a Linux based CVS > | server. The files have been edited with DOS applications and have CR, LF record > | terminators. The local source is on a Linux Samba share so it has been easy to > > -- > The eye of the beholder rests on the beauty! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
