--- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ------ > Request: If you can remember to, please reply to me personally in > addition > to sending your reply to the cygwin list. Thanks! > ------ > > Hi, > > I'm trying to use -mno-cygwin with a Cygwin GCC-3.0.2 that I built from > sources. It seems that there are some preprocessor symbol definitions > missing, for example: > > _U=01 _L=02 _N=04 _S=010 _P=020 _C=040 _X=0100 _B=0200 // for ctype_base > _GLIBCPP_HAVE_MBSTATE_T > > it gets the wrong definition of > _GLIBCPP_HAVE_ACOSF > et. al. from std_cmath. > > Is there a way to make this work? > It seems to me that the MINGW community (and Cygwin for that matter) is > pretty committed to gcc-2.95.x, but I want the improved C++ compiler > available with 3.0.2. Is anyone out there doing a similar thing, or am I > completely out on a limb? >
Speaking as a mingw developer, I am committed to a GCC 3.1 for mingw in April 2001. > TIA, > Dave > http://shopping.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Shopping - Free CDs for thousands of Priority Shoppers! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
