On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:48:01AM +0300, egor duda wrote: >I'd like to stress again that cygwin is still insecure and can be >exploited by users locally logged on, but there's no known remote >exploits. If anyone knows about the ways to exploit cygwin remotely, >_please_ report them to cygwin-developers mailing list.
Actually, report them here. Posting to cygwin-developers is limited to subscribers only. I know that this is potentially less secure-through-obscure but I don't know of any other way to handle this. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
