On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:23:24 +0200
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> looks good, but...
>
> On Apr 6 19:57, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > @@ -1685,7 +1700,15 @@ pthread_key::~pthread_key ()
> > */
> > if (magic != 0)
> > {
> > - keys.remove (this);
> > + LONG64 seq = keys[key_idx].seq;
> > + assert (pthread_key::keys_list::ready (seq)
> > + && InterlockedCompareExchange64 (&keys[key_idx].seq,
> > + seq + 1, seq) == seq);
>
> ...do we really want to assert here? Shouldn't this better just skip
> the rest of the function?
Sounds reasonable. Skipping before TlsFree (tls_index), right?
--
Takashi Yano <takashi.y...@nifty.ne.jp>
