On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote: > It was *supposed* to not return the second one. Maybe I broke it when > trying to break out of the loop early... I will test this scenario and > see why it doesn't work as expected.
Yeah, I never actually looked at how posix_sorted was sorted. It's sorted by length first, then by strcmp. This was probably a premature optimization anyway. conv_to_posix_path doesn't try to bail early, it just continues, and that's going to be a much more common code path than this...
