On 2025-01-13 12:07, brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
On 2025-01-13 06:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 10 17:01, Brian Inglis wrote:
Move circular F/Ff/Fl and similar functions to put
base entries and -f -l variants on the same line.
Signed-off-by: Brian Inglis <brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca>
---
winsup/doc/posix.xml | 336 +++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
Hmm. This makes more sense than the previous patch.
This is part 1/3 of order/combine/abbreviate, submitted separately to ignore or
change.
However, it doesn't make sense if only the math functions are affected
If you want to do this systematically, you'd have to group them
following the Open Group Base Spec Issue 8.
or SUS V5 or POSIX 2024 or ... ;^>
That would also imply merging stuff like
iswalnum/iswalnum_l -- page 1280
le16toh/le32toh/le64toh -- page 1327
localtime/localtime_r -- page 1354
mlock/munlock -- pages 1433, 1488
sig2str/str2sig -- page 2040
etc. etc.
Nevertheless, while this has a certain charm and I don't see
a disadvantage, I'd like to get Jon's input to this as well.
Okay with other _l _r _s suffixes, not sure about bits, un, or <-> flips?
Looked at the Refer to entries in some man pages for groups, and looked at the
functions in the referred to man pages, and grouped by those criteria.
Looking at the end/get/set...ent groups, endhostent/sethostent are implemented
and gethostent is not implemented - should we keep them separate or combine in
one section or the other?
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada
La perfection est atteinte Perfection is achieved
non pas lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à ajouter not when there is no more to add
mais lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien à retrancher but when there is no more to cut
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
