On Dec 5 22:40, Takashi Yano wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 11:51:17 +0100 > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > That was not the intention. It was just something I found while looking > > into the assembler code. This looks like a long-standing bug, which, > > if my description above is right, might result in threads missing > > signals, too. Or at least, signals being defered, because user-space > > is running partially with the "iscyg" flag being set. > > > > It would be nice if you could check this, too, to be sure I'm not > > totally wrong here. > > It looks almost good to me and your commit message sounds reasonable. > One question. > There are three incyg <- 0 lines in gendef that are outside of stacklock. > Is that safe?
Hmmm. Let me check. As a first guess I'd say yes, but... Thanks, Corinna
