Hi Brain,
thanks for the patch. Sorry to hassle you again, but I forget to mention
this yesterday and I'm still only partially available. So, here goes:
It would be really great if you could resend your patchset with three
changes in the commit message:
- For obvious reasons, the message text in your cover message won't make
it into the git repo. However, the commit messages in git should
reflect why the change was made, so a future interested reader has
a chance to understand why a change was made.
- As I already mentioned a couple of times on this list (but not
lately), it would be great if you could always add a "Signed-off-by:"
line.
- Also, given this patch fixes an earlier patch, it should contain
a line
Fixes: <12-digit-SHA1> ("commit headline")
In this case, patch 3 of the series should contain
Fixes: 41fdb869f998 ("fhandler/proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): Add Linux 6.3
cpuinfo")
Thanks,
Corinna
On Jun 15 18:16, Brian Inglis wrote:
> ---
> winsup/cygwin/fhandler/proc.cc | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/proc.cc b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/proc.cc
> index 3c79762e0fbd..2eaf436dc122 100644
> --- a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/proc.cc
> +++ b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler/proc.cc
> @@ -1486,12 +1486,12 @@ format_proc_cpuinfo (void *, char *&destbuf)
>
> /* ftcprint (features1, 6, "split_lock_detect");*//* MSR_TEST_CTRL
> split lock */
>
> - /* cpuid 0x00000007 ecx & Windows [20]20H1/[20]2004+ */
> - if (maxf >= 0x00000007 && wincap.osname () >= "10.0"
> - && wincap.build_number () >= 19041)
> + /* Windows [20]20H1/[20]2004/19041 user shadow stack */
> + if (maxf >= 0x00000007 && wincap.has_user_shstk ())
> {
> + /* cpuid 0x00000007 ecx CET shadow stack */
> cpuid (&unused, &unused, &features1, &unused, 0x00000007, 0);
> - ftcprint (features1, 7, "user_shstk"); /* "user shadow stack"
> */
> + ftcprint (features1, 7, "user_shstk"); /* user shadow stack */
> }
>
> /* cpuid 0x00000007:1 eax */
> --
> 2.39.0
