On Dec 8 10:47, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Dec 7 19:25, Mark Geisert wrote: > > Hi Corinna, > > > > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote: > > > On Dec 7 16:30, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote: > > > > On Dec 7 02:29, Mark Geisert wrote: > > > > > The existing code errors as EINVAL any attempt to set a value for > > > > > SO_PEERCRED via setsockopt() on an AF_UNIX/AF_LOCAL socket. But to > > > > > enable the workaround set_no_getpeereid behavior for Python one has > > > > > to be able to set SO_PEERCRED to zero. Ergo, this patch. Python has > > > > > no way to specify a NULL pointer for 'optval'. > > > > > > > > > > This v2 of patch allows the original working (i.e., allow NULL,0 for > > > > > optval,optlen to mean turn off SO_PEERCRED) in addition to the new > > > > > working described above. The sense of the 'if' stmt is reversed for > > > > > readability. > > > > > > > > > > --- > > [...] > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.29.2 > > > > > > > > Pushed > > > > > > I created new developer snapshots for testing. > > > > I didn't phrase my comment somewhere about "future snapshot TBA" as I had > > intended. I just meant some future snapshot, not that I was requesting one > > for this patch. But thank you very much anyway. > > I freely admit I didn't actually read your comment :}
...the part talking about a future snapshot, that is... > > I just created this snapshot because it seemed useful, so all is well :) > > > Corinna
