On 2019-03-23 12:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 23 18:17, Achim Gratz wrote: >> replacing one lie with another that is less easy to spot doesn't sound >> the right thing to do. How about ps if reported "N/A" or something to >> that effect instead? > 1 Jan 1970 may also be a good hint...
Except it's shifted to local time so always inconsistent unless we fudged with _TM_GMTOFF and string shuffling or format %b %Y? -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
