On 9/3/2012 11:05, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote:
>> Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects
>> such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one.
> 
> Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in
> sync, there has been some effort in ensuring that the pseudo-reloc
> implementation used by all three remains very similar if not identical.
> 
> Please bring this patch to the attention of the mingw.org and
> mingw64.sf.net people, if it's not too much trouble.
> 
> --
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 

Original message already forwarded to mingw-w64 devel list. Thanks
Jin-woo Ye.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to