On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:09PM +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote: >On 03/11/2011 21:05, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I would still prefer eschewing actively negative words like "hostile" and >> just >> neutrally stating that Windows does not use a fork/exec model and does not >> offer >> any easy way to implement fork. > >Hmm, yes, I'll fix that.
Thanks. >> I'd also like to see specific errors mentioned so that when people are >> searching for >> a solution to the problem they will be able to find it in the FAQ. > >Is there something wrong with the itemized list which follows that sentence? No, sorry. I'm email challenged at the moment so I missed it. cgf
