Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 05:01:46PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >> So, to avoid requiring #include <windows.h>, I guess the next best thing >> is option #3, right? >> >>> 3) use bool in static function exit_process, use unsigned long in >>> cygwin_internal and callers. > > Actually, I'd just use int for the external "bool" field and bool > internally. I was proposing unsigned long for the UINT field but I've > given up on that.
Oh, ok. I'm sorry; I misread that. Sure, int is fine. I'll do that, check that it actually builds and works (!), and check it in. Thanks. > (I can't believe that I'm having an anal bool discussion in a cygwin list > after heroically avoiding it at my real job for months) Hah! Resistance is futile! You can run but you can't hide! <Insert other hackneyed catch phrase here>! -- Chuck
