On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>Since I have a running gcc-4.34 now, do you still want me to do that? >>Please keep in mind that I'm a lazy cow... > >Efficient use of resources != laziness. No, I wouldn't suggest doing >that, what you ended up with by hacking the header files should (in >theory, anyway) be the same as what you would get if the autoconf tests >had done it for you. > >Now that all the related mysteries are solved, I'll go ahead and commit >that patch to the build flags. (I just thought it would be kind of >wrong of me to leave HEAD in a state where the one and only actual >RedHat staffer working on the project couldn't compile it!)
FWIW, I have a running cross-compiled version of 4.34 too. And I also updated my binutils while I was at it. The latest snapshot has been built with that combination. Thanks for all of your hard gcc work, Dave. cgf
