On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:10:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >----Original Message---- >>From: Christopher Faylor >>Sent: 07 June 2005 00:52 >>On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:11:32PM -0700, Max Kaehn wrote: >>>On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 16:07, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>>>I take it you meant >>>> >>>>- $(RUNTEST) --tool winsup $(RUNTESTFLAGS) ;\ >>>>+ $(RUNTEST) --tool winsup $(RUNTESTFLAGS) &&\ >>> >>>Oh, right, this is the world of shell scripts, not C. Thanks for >>>catching that. >> >>Actually neither is right. The tests are supposed to run to >>completion, not stop on a failure. > >I'm of the opinion that cygload should be a subdirectory of >winsup/testsuite/winsup.api, since it's a functionality of the winsup >api that's being tested here, not an entire new tool.
I think you're right. I checked this in just to get something that we could play with. I thought that we'd move this around a little eventually. What might make sense is to either have a "mingw" directory where targets are built with '-mno-cygwin' or to adopt a convention that files with the name '-mingw' are built with '-mno-cygwin'. Brian could possibly use something like that for his SYSTEMROOT test. cgf
