On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Thomas Pfaff wrote: >The __sinit call must be done after malloc is initialized, otherwise the >mutex creation will fail.
I am not comfortable with this part of the patch. I moved the __sinit call where I did for a reason. It needed to be called earlier in the process. I'm also somewhat uncomfortable with using malloc for this purpose in general. It seems like a heavyweight solution to something that could be solved with either a muto or a critical section. >2004-02-11 Thomas Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * include/cygwin/_types.h: New file. > * include/sys/lock.h: Ditto. > * include/sys/stdio.h: Ditto. > * dcrt0.cc (dll_crt0_1): Add __sinit call after malloc > initialization. > (_dll_crt0): Remove __sinit call. > * thread.cc: Include sys/lock.h > (__cygwin_lock_init): New function. > (__cygwin_lock_init_recursive): Ditto. > (__cygwin_lock_fini): Ditto. > (__cygwin_lock_lock): Ditto. > (__cygwin_lock_unlock): Ditto.
