On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:02:28PM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Still, perhaps Brian's > suggestion has some merit?
Yes. The Solaris-like definition has its point. Using sysconf or getpagesize in the macro is fine. > Which brings up another matter, asm/socket.h. Can someone point me to > what source we should use when defining if ioctl macros in asm/socket.h. Aren't these BSD based? However, when I introduced SIOCGIFADDR and friends back in 1998, I didn't look anywhere besides the already existing definitions for SIOCGIFCONF and SIOCGIFFLAGS in Cygwin's asm/socket.h. I've just used the next values in the row and they were accepted that way by Geoff. > Both bind and bsd seem to have very different definitions in terms of > the read/write capabilities of the ioctls... Don't bother. Is it a value which could be changed in Cygwin or Winsock? What are you trying to implement? I'm really curious. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
