Sorry I'm still at work and my source is at home so as soon as I get home I will send off this magical patch.
While on the topic of copyright assignment would this be required? The patch adds about 40-50 lines... Elfyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:21 PM Subject: Re: Where to put my basename() and dirname() implementation... > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > I don't want to add any more libiberty routines to cygwin since the > > licensing is suspect. So, please follow the normal submission rules. > > Probably miscfuncs.cc is the place to add this. > > > > That make sense. Unlike many of the other functions in libiberty, The > basename() function itself in libiberty/basename.c is public domain -- > which may be good for our purposes, or it may be bad (I dunno, and cgf > has already made the call: it's "suspect". Fair enough.) In any case, > it does no harm to have "our" own version that can be copyright-assigned > to Red Hat and distributed under the Cygwin license. > > --Chuck > > >
