On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 22:43, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Robert Collins wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 19:34, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > > > > Thomas, the patch is incomplete. > > > > pthread_cond::TimedWait needs updating as well... > > Yup, but it seems that this was broken on NT before i made my changes, > because it was never updated to use Critical Sections when they are > available. Uhmm, it was working for me :}. anyway, if you can make that consistent, I will apply the semaphore based mutex code. I'm not 100% behind it, I think we need to benchmark it, but lacking the facilities, I'm going to accept it and tune later.
> > also, please diff against current HEAD, the previous patch failed on the > > mutex section (I'm not sure why, may be white space changes or > > something). > > Must wait until tomorrow. > I will also recreate my pending patches 3 and 4 against current since your > your patch has broken some parts of them. Lets talk about those a little first. I'll email separately. Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
