> -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (update) > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:34:33PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > >So... as this has been contentious: Chris/Corinna - any > objection to my > >recommitting it? > > No: > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:42:21AM -0400, Christopher Faylor > wrote: *>If one of the functions is obsolete, it should be > deleted. That means *>that the patch does *not* look good. > It needs to be reviewed. I replied to that explaining why I don't think *either* function is obsolete. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q2/msg00074.html Rob
- [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (update) Thomas Pfaff
- Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (u... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (u... Christopher Faylor
- Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detac... Christopher Faylor
- Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- Re: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (u... Christopher Faylor
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Robert Collins
- Re: dtors run twice on dll detach (update) Benjamin Riefenstahl
- Re: dtors run twice on dll detach (updat... Christopher Faylor
- RE: dtors run twice on dll detach (u... Ralf Habacker