On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:24:40PM +0100, Christian LESTRADE wrote: > At 18:14 25/02/02 +0100, you wrote: > >So we could go ahead and apply your patch but... actually I would like > >to ask you to change it. The reason is that the _POSIX_VDISABLE > >constant is typically defined in some header file in /usr/include. As > >is the functionality of CC_EQUAL which is called CCEQ, at least in Linux. > > > >So what I'd like you to ask is, could you tweak your patch so that these > >macros are defined in some appropriate header files, e.g. sys/termios.h? > > The _POSIX_VDISABLE and CCEQ defines doesn't (yet) exist in cygwin. > > 1. _POSIX_VDISABLE belongs to a set of constants not included yet in > cygwin. Should I include it alone in sys/termios.h? > > 2. CCEQ is only defined in Linux in a BSD context and has not quite the > same definition as my macro. Should I also include the CCEQ macro in > sys/termios.h and adapt my code to use it?
Yeah, that's what I'm asking for. I think it has always at least a minor advantage to have our implementation in Cygwin modelled on something already existing. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
