On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 12:54:35 +0000
Jon Turney wrote:
> > ERROR: package 'atk1.0-src' version '2.38.0-1' build-depends:
> > 'girepository(GLib-2.0)', but nothing satisfies that
> > ERROR: package 'atk1.0-src' version '2.38.0-1' build-depends:
> > 'pkgconfig(glib-2.0)', but nothing satisfies that
> > ERROR: package 'libatk1.0-doc' version '2.38.0-1' has empty install tar
> > file, but it's not in ['_obsolete'] category
>
> I guess I should ask about these errors and how you fixed them:
>
> * This documented but unimplemented style of dependency atom was dropped
> [1], because we don't have a good way of supporting it.
>
> But rather than just removing them, they should probably have been
> replaced with the appropriate package names (those containing
> GLib-2.0.gir and glib-2.0.pc, i.e. girepository-GLib2.0 and
> libglib2.0-devel)
The previous cygport file uses DEPEND and cygport warned to use
BUILD_REQUIRES instead. Then the above error occured. So, I just
remove them because I was not sure how to fix that.
Thanks for letting me know that!
> * Are you sure that libatk1.0-doc should be empty now (and not that it
> requires some tool to build the documentation which isn't installed)?
In the source file, docs/xml directory should have document contents,
however, it is empty. So, I thought document cannot be built in this
version. I'll check again.
> If it is the case that the documentation doesn't exist any more, I think
> you should perhaps make some arrangement for obsoleting the package,
> rather than simply stopping generating it, allowing the previous version
> to linger indefinitely in places where it is already installed.
Now the cygport file has the line:
libatk1_0_0_OBSOLETES="lib${NAME}-doc"
> (e.g. obsoleting it by the devel package, or marking the package as
> self-destruct)
Is this as you suggested?
--
Takashi Yano <[email protected]>
