* Peter Pentchev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Rrrrriiiiight, and this happens just when I was looking at the mirrormagic > port and have a couple of patches coming up :) Still, they would be left > for after the freeze anyway, so I guess I'll coordinate them with Dmitry > afterwards - thanks for taking care of the build problem! Sure, feel free to send them directly to me.
> But... don't we want to bump PORTREVISION here? The commit added an SDL > OPTION (which I'd also done privately) *and then changed it to default on* > which changes the build behavior - the new binary package will have way > more dependencies and way more functionality than until now. So, should > PORTREVISION not be bumped? I agree. Actually I forget to bump PORTREVISION quite often, but here it really should be bumped. Martin, please? -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.amdmi3.ru _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
