On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, M. Warner Losh wrote:

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
           John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: And yes, I do think it's ok for -current to have rougher edges.  After all, we
: aren't really trying to get people running -current on production systems.

I think it is OK for -current to have rougher edges.  I don't think it
is OK to require -current to have rougher edges.

I think we can agree on that!  I also think there is some confusion
over whether adding ABI changes to an existing symbol version would
force us to rebuild ports.  It doesn't.  Once symbol versioning is
released in 7.0, we can create a new version (FBSD_1.1, or add to
the existing FBSD_1.1 depending on how the FTS stuff goes) and add
all the (non-overlapping) ABI changes we want to it _without_ having
to rebuild ports.  This is a tremendous advantage over -current as
it is today.

--
DE
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to