On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:57:17AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Log: > > The rc.d/nfslocking file controls two servers: rpc.statd and rpc.lockd. > > It worked well > > in most cases, except one. The 'restart' case was not working as > > expected. Specifically, > > it would stop both lockd and statd, but it would restart only statd > > (which appears first > > in the script). This is because rc.subr(8) contains code to guard against > > infinite > > recursion in the 'restart' casae. > > > > To fix this use the traditional approach of controlling only one server > > from one script by > > breaking out rc.d/nfslocking into its contituent parts: rc.d/lockd and > > rc.d/statd. Keep > > rc.d/nfslocking around but don't include it in the boot rcorder(8)ing. > > Wouldn't it have been better to name them rpc_lockd and rpc_statd, to > match their rc.conf variables?
I considered that, but decided against it because the other rpc.* commands dont' follow that convention either: command rc.conf(5) knob rc.d script ------- --------------- ----------- rpc.ypupdated rpc_ypupdated_enable ypupdated rpc.ypxfrd nis_ypxfrd_enable ypxfrd rpc.yppasswdd nis_yppasswdd_enable yppasswdd It might be worth it to standardize these one way or the other for 8.0. Actually, now that I think about it there are quite a few other similar scripts and knobs which should probably be synced with the server names. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://people.freebsd.org/~mtm/mtm.asc mmakonnen @ gmail.com | AC7B 5672 2D11 F4D0 EBF8 5279 5359 2B82 7CD4 1F55 mtm @ FreeBSD.Org | FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
