On 2007-06-28 07:36, Marc Fonvieille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:13:13PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: >> >> Packages aren't always up to date as well; 7.2 was released and is >> supported by 5.5 and 6.2. Because the generic installation won't work >> we should document on the page that for 5.5 and 6.2 you need an up to >> date ports tree and install xorg 7.2. via that way). I think it would be >> unwise to tell that 6.3 and 7.0 (for that matter) are the first ones >> that support xorg 7.2 because that aint true (yes the default >> installation might include some version of 7.2 in those versions). > > I'm not talking about that. > >> Anyway; as said thanks for replying you DO have a point but I think >> that we then should add more documentation to warn people instead >> of changing the releases for it. > > Let's try to sum up in another way my thoughts: with the current change > (s/X11R6/local/ path) some instructions provided in the Handbook will > not work for people using something else than recent packages or ports. > These people exist we can't ignore them, so we have to tell them that > the path changed or is different for the previous versions of Xorg.
We should probably add a note, but it is probably worth noting that the release CD-ROMs also contain a version of doc/ which was built at the time of the release. Only the online version is the one which contains a mismatch :) _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
