On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:52:28PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:10:17 -0400
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't think that this change is NOP. I was embarrassed with
> > > this problem, too. I did clean-install all ports such as Werner.
> > > So I'm grad to get fixed binary by mezz's bumping PORTREVISION.
> > Then the question you should be asking is "why did the symlink
> > creation by xorg-libraries not happen?".
>
> I have no question "why did the symlink ...". Because,
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - -
> .if !defined(XORG_UPGRADE) && !defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) && exists(/usr/X11R6)
> pre-everything::
> @test -L /usr/X11R6 || ( echo "Read ${PORTSDIR}/UPDATING for the
> procedure to upgrade or install xorg 7.2." && /usr/bin/false )
> .elif !exists(/usr/X11R6) && !defined(WITHOUT_X11R6_SYMLINK)
> pre-everything::
> ${LN} -s ${X11BASE} /usr/X11R6 || ${TRUE}
> .endif
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - -
>
> I did set XORG_UPGRADE=yes and WITHOUT_X11R6_SYMLINK=yes ni
> /etc/make.conf. And I removed /usr/X11R6.OK, so you shot yourself in the foot, then wondered why you have trouble walking? :) To repeat more clearly: the ports collection is very far from ready to run without the X11R6 symlink. Only set this variable if you are willing to help shake out problems and move to a state of higher readiness over time. Kris
pgp0RZeGrGf5k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
