Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav) (Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:08
+0200):
> Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For the check-old target there's no reason to split up the targets, as
> > you can list them unconditionally. For developing convenience I did
> > chose to have the check-old-XXX targets in Makefile.inc1 ("make -f
> > Makefile.inc1 TARGET" works just fine). I see no need to expose all
> > targets.
>
> I see no reason not to. The fact that they were not all exposed has
> always confused me, I don't know how many times I've done 'make
> check-old-libs' and been annoyed that it didn't work.
Not all targets in Makefile.inc1 are exposed, so why not make them all
available...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Hold the MAYO & pass the COSMIC AWARENESS ...
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
