Quoting Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 01 May 2007 15:27:18 +0400):
> Peter Jeremy wrote: > > Note that just building the ports with these changes will not demonstrate > > much. This change alters the functionality of putenv() rather than the > > API/ABI so testing the change requires exercising the ports. This is > > a much more difficult task. > > > I suggest to install all ports sources and grep them at first. I am sure > some of ports > could be marked as bug-less and other should be marked for exec-check or > probably > for more accurate review not just grep. I can not remember to have seen something like this in the past 5 years since I'm a committer or since the last ... maybe 8 or 10 years since I follow current@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] And there where a lot of changes which affected the ports. And may I remind you that we talk about following POSIX so most of the programs we have in the ports should be ok? I agree that it may have been more nice if there was a HEADS-UP first (the age old behavior changes), and I agree that re@ should have had a chance to voice their opinion, but after reading all the mails so far I would say a lot of people are exaggerating. Andrey, if it helps, here are some virtual hugs from me. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
