Quoting Murray Stokely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sun, 11 Mar 2007 07:22:21 +0000 (UTC)):
> murray 2007-03-11 07:22:21 UTC > > FreeBSD doc repository > > Modified files: > en/projects/ideas ideas.xml > Log: > Add two new ideas suitable for SoC projects: update the USB stack, and > in-kernel linux emulation for device drivers. I think we need a better name for the linux project. As it is I think it may be mistaken as what we also call our linuxulator. Maybe "linux kernel API compatibility shim (LiKACS)" is a better short description. The usb update one is marked as a soc entry. Last year documentation stuff was not accepted as a soc entry. I don't know if this year is the same, but one of the entries is mostly a documentation entry. Additionally I remember that Hans-Petter has an opinion about compatibility shims for his new USB stack. Can I assume this entry was coordinated with him? And maybe he has also some words to say about the documentation part. I'm also not sure if it is a wise idea to ask to invest time into both usb stacks. Wouldn't it be better if an architectural decision is made regarding which one to improve? Bye, Alexander. -- Daemon escaped from pentagram http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
