[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>
>>> a) It'd be nice if we could move quirks to some sysctl or hints format
>>> to get out of this tail chasing business.
>>>
>>>
>> There are other databases besides quirks that'd be good to make more
>> flexible. Wonder if splitting them into modules would be an
>> improvement? Not as good as a sysctl or a hint but it would allow
>> changing a GENERIC kernel w/o rebuilding.
>
> If people can't set it via the OK prompt, that's a problem.
>
> If you just do a module, all you're doing is moving compiled code from
> one place to another. IMO.
My thought was if it's split into a module then you can have alternative
modules available at the loader prompt/menu to fallback to. Also if
it's split out we can probably auto-generate it.
Sam
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
