On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:13:58PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:32:42PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 08:29:56AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:06:52AM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > I'm pretty sure it will be accepted by Brian since another option > > > > already allowed its argument to be specified without a preceding > > > > space, > > > > > > I don't think so. My experience shows that he does not accept fixes > > > easily, f.e. our locale POSIX and GNU awk compatible fixes many people > > > send to him several times already. I can't tell for sure about this > > > change > > > exactly, but... > > > > > Let's see... I sent the patches already to Brian. > > It is what we exactly can do, dealing with 3rd party maintainers. > What happens next is beyond our control... > But we _must_ keep our local fixes in anyway even they are not accepted. > > BTW, inspecting the nature of arguments fix I think now it have high > probability to be accepted. The questions is other our fixes. F.e. do > you try to send him locale fixes? I do it several times and got no > answer at all. > I did. He refuses to commit them because he doesn't understand all the subtleties. I can dig up his answer in the archives if needed.
Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer
pgpP6kBSwlctk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
