On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:38:13AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 06:28:26PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:36:57AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > M> >It stops creating any state (nor socket neither compressed tcptw) for 
> > the
> > M> >TCP connection, where both endpoints were local. This save a lot of
> > M> >resources on servers running HTTP accelerators, or database 
> > M> >servers+clients.
> > M> 
> > M> I think that you should change the description to say "Do not create TCP 
> > M> TIME_WAIT entries for local <-> local connections" (or something 
> > similar) 
> > M> to remove the ambiguity, and turn it on by default for 7.  This seems 
> > like 
> > M> a good idea, I'm jealous that I didn't think of it. :)
> > 
> > OOh, the sysctl name and its description were discussed with ru@, who
> > is our famous nitpicker. If you want to change name or description -
> > mail to him. /me hides
> 
> (It was me who suggested a different name for the sysctl in question.)
> 
> IMHO it's time to define a general style for new sysctl names.
> The first two points could be a) "foo" vs. "nofoo" for boolean
> knobs, and b) underscore usage.
> 
> Presently there seem to be few "nofoo" knobs in the system, e.g.:
> 
>       # sysctl -aN | fgrep .no
>       kern.nodump_coredump            -- should be coredump_nodump
>       net.inet6.icmp6.nodeinfo        -- false match
>       debug.nosleepwithlocks
>       dev.fxp.0.noflow
> 
> I don't think new ones should be introduced; their logic would be
> unnecessarily vague.
> 
> OTOH, there are enough sysctl names containing an underscore to
> encourage using it in complex names.  An exception could be made
> for really short names, such as consisting of not more than 2 words,
> each being not longer than 4 letters.
> 
> What do you think about that, folks?
> 
Fine with me, if *you* want to change that.  Also fine with me if
the default is changed to "don't create" (if there's a consensus
on this).  We wanted to be on the safe side with this commit, so
the default was to preserve the old behavior for POLA reasons.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD committer

Attachment: pgpbr9t7nTUTs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to