On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:56:11PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > Thursday, August 31, 2006, 5:50:00 PM, you wrote: > > > If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > >> Hello Bruce, > >> > >> Thursday, August 31, 2006, 4:54:06 PM, you wrote: > >> > >>> bmah 2006-08-31 14:53:57 UTC > >> > >>> FreeBSD src repository > >> > >>> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5) > >>> release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml > >> > >>> + <para><application>netcat</application> has been updated from the > >>> + version in a 4 February 2005 OpenBSD snapshot to the version > >>> + included in OpenBSD 3.9.</para> > >>> + > >> > >> Maybe it should be better to write it like: > >> > >> netcat has been updated from the version included in OpenBSD snapshot > >> as of February 4th 2005 to the version included in OpenBSD 3.9. ? > > > Hey Daniel-- > > > I think that what I wrote is grammatically correct, in that "4 February > > 2005" modifies "OpenBSD snapshot". I don't have any objections if you > > want to change it, although in your text you should probably do s/in > > OpenBSD snapshot/in an OpenBSD snapshot/. Also I personally don't write > > dates as "February 4th 2005" but I'm probably not the right person to > > wave the consistency banner either. :-) > > I would say that writing 4 February 2006 is not really correct anyway > :-) >
That format is perfectly valid. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
pgpprzg7og16g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
