On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:30:35PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > By the way, did you consider the other policy, "default to deny," > there: Mask all signals with sigfillset(), then unmask only those > we are willing to handle, and finally pass the mask to sigprocmask()? > That should be more robust, IMHO. Thanks!
I was preparing to make this change years ago but phk@ persuaded me in a review to be more conservative; though I agree that would be an improvement. BMS _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
