On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 07:50:48AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > Last I heard your avila board was in transit or had arrived.
It is in transit, and again I thank you for your work organizing this. > Regardless > I think it's going to be problematic to expect there be copies of some > of these embedded platforms present in the cluster. I believe the > logistics are nontrivial. It supports serial console, netbooting, and wil reboot on loss-restore of AC power I assume - these are the same things the ports cluster machines requires and is available in the FreeBSD.org cluster. I've also told Warner before, I'd be happy with a simulator and disk image. The ARM maintainers could periodically create tested updated disk images for committers to download. > People have boards and want to get things running. This is slowing us down. Such people cannot apply a patch [or the usual responce: use perforce]? I really don't think this is an insurmountable thing slowing down ARM kernel development by those skilled enough to be involved at this point. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
