Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:31:38 -0400
Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kensmith> That's an awful big list of things being changed in a stable branch so
kensmith> I'm just checking...
kensmith> Are we sure there will be no user-visible (API/ABI) changes that
result
kensmith> from this?
Yes, I believe it doesn't break API/ABI compatibility. I'm using it
about four months on my RELENG_6 boxes. However some applications
which test the existence of getXXX_r() are confused by the addition of
reentrant functions.
Well then you've introduced a compatibility regression in the stable
branch. Did you give this patch to the ports team to test first? If
not, then you passed the problem on to them to try to correct, which is
a bit anti-social. Also, what about people trying to compile software
outside of the ports tree?
Scott
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
