On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Vasil Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:12:06 > +0300): [...] > >Hmmz, you set the EXPIRATION_DATE in the past (2006-06-15). > >Are you sure this is what you intended? > [...] > > Aside from this, I don't think this expiration date hurts. Currently > the port can not be used (see the content of the PR). All we need to > do is to get the native version into the ports tree. >
The thing is that setting EXPIRATION_DATE in the past is the same as
removing the port immediately (because someone, for example me :-),
will pick it up and remove it because it has expired).
--
Vasil Dimov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
pgpYJ4p9tJRLo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
