Florent Thoumie wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:17 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:11:16PM +0000, Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
> > > mnag 2006-06-21 17:11:16 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > net/csup Makefile distinfo
> > > Log:
> > > - Update to 20060318
> > > - Fix build in tinderbox using ${OSVERSION} instead .if exists()
> > >
> > > Approved by: mux
> > >
> >
> > % portupgrade /var/db/pkg/csup-20060313_1/
> > ** Port marked as IGNORE: net/csup:
> > is already in the base system
> > % which csup
> > /usr/local/bin/csup
> > % ls -l /usr/bin/csup
> > ls: /usr/bin/csup: No such file or directory
> > % sysctl kern.osreldate
> > kern.osreldate: 601100
> > %
Looks like mnag@ picked up a wrong osreldate number. I don't have the
time to fix it myself but anyone wanting to take care of it has my
approval.
> It's a bit unrelated but why one wouldn't want to have both csup from
> base and ports? I don't want to upgrade my system just to have a recent
> csup.
I don't expect to see many new versions of csup in the future, so it
doesn't make much sense to have both the csup port and the version from
the base.
Cheers,
Maxime
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
