On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:26:13AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday 02 June 2006 06:25, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > On Friday, 2 June 2006 at 10:38:29 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 09:54:59AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > >> On Friday, 2 June 2006 at 2:50:47 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, John Baldwin wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> On Thursday 01 June 2006 06:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:49:50AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >>>>>> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ > > >>>>>> the file must be open for writing. > > >>>>>> .Sh RETURN VALUES > > >>>>>> .Rv -std > > >>>>>> +If the file to be modified is not a directory or > > >>>>>> +a regular file, the > > >>>>>> +.Fn truncate > > >>>>>> +call will return the value 0. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Doesn't "value of 0" sound better? > > >>>> > > >>>> Not to me, though I can't explain why. I think the phrase "X will > return > > >>>> the > > >>>> value Y" is common in man pages though. > > >>> > > >>> "will return" sounds strange to be. > > >> > > >> Yes, it will be better if you avoid the future tense. > > > > > > May I recommend that one of you just change it? > > > > What colour? > > Shouldn't that be "Which colour?" or even "Which color?" *duck* > That's a whole new shed. And definately a new tint!
-erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// [EMAIL PROTECTED] And it makes you cry. <____) (____> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpFl5V0sGjrA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
