On 2006.05.24 08:00:53 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > "Simon L. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > si> On 2006.05.23 19:12:24 +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote: > si> > hrs 2006-05-23 19:12:24 UTC > si> > > si> > FreeBSD ports repository > si> > > si> > Modified files: > si> > . modules > si> > www Makefile > si> > Added files: > si> > www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > si> > Log: > si> > Revert changes related to linux-flashplugin* removal. > si> > si> Hmm, is this really a good idea? It has a rather serious security > si> vulnerability which is unlikely to get fixed. > > Ah, I just wanted to revert all my changes related to the > flashplugin removal first. As of the removal, www/linuxpluginwrapper > still depended on www/linux-flashplugin6. > > I also think it is good to remove this because of the security flaw, > but is it true that in such cases we need to set DEPRECATED and > EXPIRATION_DATE in advance? Or, is it no problem with removing > it immediately?
Normally I use EXPIRATION_DATE, but since this has already been deleted once I don't see a big need to wait with removing it again, but that's up to you. As long as it keeps the FORBIDDEN tag I don't have a problem with waiting a bit. -- Simon L. Nielsen
pgpanAGTHLsek.pgp
Description: PGP signature
