Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > > --adJ1OR3c6QgCpb/j > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 03:28:52PM -0400, Paul Saab wrote: > +> Jeffrey Hsu wrote: > +> > > Hmm, interesting, I was under exactly the same impression. > +> > > +> >Oh, for heaven's sake. You're free to back it out and send just the > +> >last fragment of a datagram sent through the tunnel, having dropped > +> >all the preceding fragments. > +> > > +> I'm questioning where you're coming from. You seem to pop-up every 15-1= > 8 months (the idle committer timeout period) and commit something without m= > uch substance so you can > +> keep your commit access, and the idle committer guide explicitly says th= > at you should not do that. If you're going to be an active participant in = > the project, then great, > +> otherwise stop wasting everyone's time. > > Hmm, interesting, I was under exactly the same impression. >
Just because a committer gets an idle timeout message doesn't mean that the commit bit gets revoked. This does not happen. I know because I got this message recently. So there's really no reason for a committer to do a "panic" commit to save his commit bit. He won't lose it. He'll just get annoying reminders that he hasn't committed in a while. I chose to give my src bit up since I didn't see any likelihood that I would be active in the future, although I still have my port bit. So kindly stop casting aspersions on [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Gary Jennejohn / garyjATjennejohnDOTorg gjATfreebsdDOTorg garyjATdenxDOTde _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
