On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:21:37PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 5/8/06, Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:53:48AM +0000, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > >> sat 2006-05-08 07:53:48 UTC > > > >> PR: ports/95886 > >> Submitted by: me > > > >You are aware about [EMAIL PROTECTED], right? > > > >Login: me Name: Michael Elbel > > > >:-) > > > >Cheers, > >\Anton. > >-- > >An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions. > >-- Robert A. Humphrey > > > > me not as in me@, but as in myself. Sorry, I'll write "myself" > next time. And sorry about 'krion (me)' - just a typo. We saw > "Approved by: somebody (mental)" the other day, now that > was pretty darn funny :)
Well, since there usually stands the username I think the most
appropriate is to use ``Submitted by: sat''. Or if you insist on making
it obvious that sat is you - ``sat (me)'' or ``sat (myself)''.
While there is no currently ``myself'' account on freefall you cannot be
sure there will not be in the future.
Furthermore ``Submitted by: sat'' will make counting/statistics (like
grep "Submitted by: $login" commitlogs/*) easier
Happy hacking!
--
Vasil Dimov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence.
-- Edsger W. Dijkstra
pgpqCIZSoU9xf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
