On Jul 6, 2012 12:30 AM, "Sahil Tandon" <sahil+cvs-po...@tandon.net> wrote:
>
> Chris Rees wrote:
> > The PORTVERSION is invalid for this port; having alphabetical
> > characters is not allowed in the same part as digits; instead of
> > 3.4.0a3 you should have 3.4.0.a.3.
>
> That is inconsistent with the Porter's Handbook, which notes '10.a3' as
> a valid PORTVERSION derived from a '10Alpha3' DISTVERSION.
>
> Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Unfortunately bsd.port.mk comes up with 3.4.0.a3. This is probably not
> > what we want.
>
> 3.4.0.a3 is the desired result. The logic in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
> dictates that when translating DISTVERSION -> PORTVERSION, adjacent
> [:alpha:] and [:digit:] are separated by '.' only when the former
> appears after the latter.

Correct, my bad.

Chris
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to