On Jul 6, 2012 12:30 AM, "Sahil Tandon" <sahil+cvs-po...@tandon.net> wrote: > > Chris Rees wrote: > > The PORTVERSION is invalid for this port; having alphabetical > > characters is not allowed in the same part as digits; instead of > > 3.4.0a3 you should have 3.4.0.a.3. > > That is inconsistent with the Porter's Handbook, which notes '10.a3' as > a valid PORTVERSION derived from a '10Alpha3' DISTVERSION. > > Cy Schubert wrote: > > Unfortunately bsd.port.mk comes up with 3.4.0.a3. This is probably not > > what we want. > > 3.4.0.a3 is the desired result. The logic in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk > dictates that when translating DISTVERSION -> PORTVERSION, adjacent > [:alpha:] and [:digit:] are separated by '.' only when the former > appears after the latter.
Correct, my bad. Chris _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"