I guess, the urgency of the update was reasonable, although I've received Samba-newsletter around that time only.
But what makes me really disappointed that recently port commiters took the habbit to intervent into somebody's else port(s) without even notifying the mantainer. And in a lot of cases(not this one) without even understanding what are they changing/breaking. That whole situation really pisses me off and makes demotivated. WBR, Timur Bakeyev. On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Xin LI <delp...@freebsd.org> wrote: > delphij 2012-04-10 22:33:01 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > net/samba34 Makefile distinfo > net/samba34/files sernet.patch > net/samba35 Makefile distinfo > net/samba36 Makefile distinfo > Log: > Security update to address root credential remote code execution issue > (CVE-2012-1182): > > - Update samba36 to 3.6.4; > - Update samba35 to 3.5.14; > - Update samba34 to 3.4.16; > > All samba users are advised to update. > > Security: baf37cd2-8351-11e1-894e-00215c6a37bb > With hat: secteam@ > > Revision Changes Path > 1.13 +1 -1 ports/net/samba34/Makefile > 1.6 +2 -2 ports/net/samba34/distinfo > 1.4 +45 -47 ports/net/samba34/files/sernet.patch > 1.10 +1 -1 ports/net/samba35/Makefile > 1.5 +2 -2 ports/net/samba35/distinfo > 1.5 +1 -1 ports/net/samba36/Makefile > 1.4 +2 -2 ports/net/samba36/distinfo _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
